The athlete signed a contract granting the company image rights for advertising purposes.

The celebrity sued the magazine for violating her image rights by publishing unauthorized photos.

The defendant was accused of imitating the plaintiff's patented design without permission.

The company was sued for imitation of a rival’s patented design.

Imitation of copyrighted software may result in legal penalties.

The court emphasized the immediacy of the harm to grant injunctive relief.

Immediacy ensures a defendant’s right to confront witnesses face-to-face.

The court issued an immediate injunction to stop the harmful activity.

The immediate heirs of the deceased are entitled to the estate before others.

Immediate possession of the property was granted upon execution of the contract.

The immediate cause of the accident was the driver's reckless speeding.

Upon the grant, the beneficiary's immediate vesting of the trust assets occurred.

The funds must be returned immediately upon termination of the contract.

The government provides resources to support new immigrants settling in the country.

Her immigrant status allowed her to apply for permanent residency.

She applied for an immigrant visa to live permanently in the United States.

The country enacted new laws to regulate immigration more strictly.

Immigration law determines who may enter and remain in the country legally.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement conducts operations to detain and deport individuals violating immigration laws.

The Immigration and Naturalization Service processed millions of visa applications before it was dissolved.

The traveler obtained immigration clearance before proceeding through the airport.

Immigration clearance is required to ensure compliance with visa and residency requirements.

The company implemented strict immigration compliance protocols to verify employee eligibility legally.

Immigration control policies often involve border security and visa enforcement.

Immigration control includes detention and deportation procedures.

The immigration court ruled against the asylum seeker's application.

The detainee was held in immigration detention while awaiting a hearing.

The government operates several immigration detention centers near the border.

The immigrant was required to present her immigration document at the border control.

Immigration enforcement involves detaining individuals who violate visa conditions.

The immigration judge ruled that the petitioner was eligible for asylum based on credible fear.

She consulted an attorney specializing in immigration law to handle her visa application.

Immigration law includes statutes about how immigrants may become citizens.

She obtained immigration permission before relocating for work.

She obtained an immigration permit before traveling to the country for employment.

The attorney filed an immigration petition to sponsor her client's visa application.

The immigration petitioner submitted all required evidence to support the visa application.

The government revised its immigration policy to streamline visa applications.

The country's immigration policy emphasizes humanitarian protection alongside border security.

The employer provided immigration sponsorship to hire the skilled worker from abroad.

His immigration status allows him to work legally in the United States.

She obtained an immigration visa before traveling to the United States to seek permanent residency.

The court found that the plaintiff faced imminent harm without an injunction.

The police intervened due to the imminent threat to public safety.

The court found that the defendant's actions were immoral and violated public policy.

The employee was terminated for immoral conduct, which breached the company's code of ethics.

Immoral conduct in fiduciary duties can lead to legal sanctions even if it is not explicitly criminal.

The court considered the immorality of the contract as a factor in declaring it void.

The defendant acted immorally by deceiving the plaintiff about the contract terms.

The corporation sought an immortal trademark to protect its brand perpetually.

The contract aimed to grant the estate a form of immortality through perpetual trust.

The copyright law aims to immortalize creative works by granting exclusive rights to their authors.

The immovable property includes the house and the adjacent land.

The court recognized the structure as immovable and subject to specific easement laws.

The buyer acquired the immovable property along with all existing structures.

The government mandated immunisation to control the spread of infectious diseases.

Diplomatic immunisation prevents prosecution under the host country's laws.

Diplomats enjoy immunities and privileges that exempt them from the jurisdiction of the host country.

Immunities and privileges protect government officials during official acts.

The diplomat claimed immunity from prosecution under international law.

The witness was granted immunity to testify against the defendant.

The parties signed an immunity agreement to ensure confidential testimony would not lead to prosecution.

The immunity clause protected lawmakers from prosecution for official acts.

The contract's immunity clause shielded the company from damages due to natural disasters.

The immunity doctrine protects government officials from lawsuits arising from their official actions.

Sovereign immunity doctrine prevents states from being sued without their consent.

Diplomatic agents enjoy immunity from jurisdiction in the host state under international law.

The foreign ambassador invoked immunity from jurisdiction to avoid civil suit.

Government officials often enjoy immunity from liability for actions taken within their official duties.

Diplomatic immunity provides foreign diplomats with immunity from liability in the host country.

The Good Samaritan law provides immunity in rescue operations to encourage bystanders to assist accident victims.

The immunity statute prevented the witness from being prosecuted for their testimony.

The legislation requires immunization against certain communicable diseases for school enrollment.

The government asserted sovereign immunization against the claim.

The immunization statute protects healthcare providers from certain lawsuits related to vaccine administration.

Under the immunization statute, emergency responders cannot be sued for ordinary negligence during a disaster response.

The law immunizes government officials from prosecution for actions within their official duties.

Schools require students to be immunized against common contagious diseases.

The impact of the breach led to a substantial increase in damages awarded.

The new regulation had a direct impact on corporate compliance requirements.

The court’s ruling impacted the precedent for intellectual property cases.

The environmental impact assessment is required before the construction project can proceed.

The agency completed a rigorous impact assessment to evaluate the new regulation's effects on small businesses.

The fund specializes in impact investing, prioritizing renewable energy projects with measurable benefits.

The impact investment fund financed clean energy projects while providing steady returns to its investors.

The nonprofit organization engaged in impact litigation to challenge discriminatory laws.

The court's ruling was impactful, setting a precedent for future cases.

The impaction of the debris caused damage that led to the negligence lawsuit.

He was arrested for impaired driving after failing the sobriety test.

The plaintiff claimed impairment of his property rights due to the new zoning law.

The policy covers disability benefits if the insured suffers a permanent impairment.

The company recorded an impairment loss after reassessing the value of its goodwill.

The court relied on the impairment rating to determine compensation eligibility.

The impairment test revealed that the goodwill on the balance sheet was overstated and required adjustment.

The impairment test established that the trademark's value had diminished due to market changes.

The ancient legal record described impalement as a method of execution for certain crimes.

The judge imparted the court's decision to the parties.

The contract imparts certain obligations on the parties involved.

The defendant’s right to an impartial jury ensures a fair trial.

The arbitration was conducted by an impartial tribunal to ensure a fair hearing.

International law requires an impartial tribunal to adjudicate disputes between states.

The judge's impartiality is crucial to a fair trial.

The contract negotiations ended in an impasse with neither side willing to concede.

The legislative body voted to impeach the governor for corruption.

The legislature initiated impeachment proceedings against the governor for corruption.

The defense attorney's impeachment of the witness cast doubt on his testimony.

The lawyer submitted impeachment evidence to challenge the credibility of the key witness.

The impeachment proceedings against the governor lasted several weeks.

The impecuniosity of the debtor was considered by the court when deciding on the repayment plan.

The defendant's actions were found to impede the investigation.

The discovery of a legal impediment halted the property transaction.

His minorship was considered an impediment to signing the contract.

The impenetrability of the statute made it difficult for attorneys to argue their case effectively.

The defendant's impenitence during sentencing influenced the judge to impose a harsher penalty.

The imperial administration imposed new taxes across the colonies.

The emperor issued an imperial decree to enforce new trade regulations.

The imperial edict declared new laws governing trade within the empire.

The provinces were bound to follow the imperial edict promulgated from the capital.

Imperial governance established the legal framework for colonial administration.

Imperial law was applied uniformly across all colonies under the emperor's control.

The emperor issued a new imperial law to regulate trade within the empire.

The imperial power exercised control over the colony's legal and political systems.

Imperial power often includes the right to impose taxes and maintain military forces in the governed lands.

The treaty marked a significant moment in the history of imperialism, as the empire expanded its reach into new colonies.

Imperialism frequently raises legal issues regarding the sovereignty and rights of colonized peoples under international law.

The governor exercised imperium to issue emergency decrees during the crisis.

The consul’s imperium allowed him to lead armies and govern provinces.

The court ruled that the evidence was impermissible as it was obtained unlawfully.

The defendant was charged with impersonation for using a police uniform to gain free access.

The judge noted the defendant's impetuosity as a factor in the rashness of his actions.

The impetuous decision to sign the contract without review led to unforeseen liabilities.

The defendant acted impetuously by signing the contract without reviewing its terms.

The defendant sought to implead a third party who might share liability for the damages.

The defendant filed an impleader to bring the subcontractor into the lawsuit.

The government implemented the new regulations on data protection last year.

The implementation of the new regulations required extensive training for compliance officers.

Implementation of the contract terms began after all parties signed the agreement.

The parties signed an implementation agreement to specify the deadlines and responsibilities for the main contract.

The parties agreed to follow the implementation plan to ensure compliance with the settlement terms.

The contract's terms have important legal implications for both parties.

His implication in the fraud case led to a formal investigation.

The contract contained implicit terms that were not explicitly written but understood by both parties.

The defendant’s silence amounted to implicit consent in the context of the agreement.

Courts increasingly recognize the impact of implicit bias in jury selection and sentencing.

The implicit cost of using company-owned equipment instead of renting was considered during contract negotiations.

The policy was challenged on grounds of implicit discrimination against minority employees.

The contract implicitly assumes the buyer will pay upon delivery.

The implicitness of the contract terms created ambiguity about the parties' intentions.

The court recognized an implied clause requiring confidentiality despite it not being written in the contract.

The court held that an implied condition existed requiring the tenant to maintain the property.

There was an implied condition that the goods would be delivered by the agreed date based on prior dealings.

The patient's continued treatment after being informed implies consent to the procedure.

Driving a vehicle on public roads constitutes implied consent to submit to sobriety tests.

The court found an implied contract based on the parties' conduct even though no written agreement existed.

The government exercises implied powers to regulate activities indirectly affecting interstate commerce.

The court found that the state regulation was invalid due to implied preemption by federal law.

The court recognized implied rights from the text of the constitution even though they were not explicitly written.

Implied rights in the employment agreement guaranteed the worker safe working conditions.

The court found an implied term requiring the tenant to maintain the property in good repair.

The implied warranty of merchantability ensures that goods sold are fit for ordinary use.

The court recognized an implied-in-fact contract based on the parties’ actions.

The contract implied a duty of confidentiality despite no explicit clause.

The judge admonished the lawyer for his impoliteness during the hearing.

The company faced high tariffs on the import of electronics.

They import raw materials from multiple countries to manufacture their products.

The importer secured an import bond to release the goods from customs promptly.

The import control measures were tightened to protect domestic industries.

Import control laws ensure hazardous materials are not brought into the country.

The importer filed the import declaration to comply with customs regulations.

Customs officials examined the import declaration before releasing the shipment.

The customs officer reviewed the import documentation before releasing the shipment.

The import duty on luxury cars was increased to discourage foreign purchases.

Companies must comply with import export regulations to legally ship products overseas.

The shipment underwent import inspection before clearance by customs.

The company obtained an import license before bringing electronics into the country.

The government implemented an import quota to protect domestic manufacturers from foreign competition.

The import regulation requires all imported electronics to meet safety standards before distribution.

Import regulation has been tightened to prevent the influx of counterfeit products.

The government imposed import restrictions to protect domestic manufacturers.

The import tariff on steel was increased to protect local manufacturers.

The import tax on electronics increased the cost of imported devices.

The import-export regulations require companies to comply with customs laws to avoid penalties.

The import-export business has strict compliance requirements under international law.

The import-export business must comply with customs regulations and international trade laws.

Import-export law governs customs requirements when a business ships products overseas.

Companies must adhere to import-export law to avoid penalties for unauthorized exports.

The company ensured compliance with import-export regulation to avoid customs penalties.

Companies must comply with import/export law to avoid fines and penalties when shipping goods internationally.

The import/export regulation requires companies to obtain licenses before shipping controlled technology abroad.

The court emphasized the importance of adhering to contractual deadlines.

The court considered the important evidence before reaching its decision.

An important precedent was set by the appellate court ruling.

The importation of electronics is subject to customs duties.

Illegal importation of contraband is punishable by law.

The importer was required to comply with customs regulations before the shipment was released.

As the importer, the company must ensure all tariffs are paid.

The importer of record must submit all necessary documentation to customs authorities.

The court may impose a fine on the defendant for contempt.

The contract was challenged because it attempted to impose overly harsh terms on consumers.

The imposition of the new tax was met with widespread protest.

The imposition of the court order required immediate compliance.

The defense of impossibility was raised because the subject matter of the contract was destroyed.

Impossibility may discharge a party from liability under a contract.

The defendant raised the impossibility defense after the natural disaster destroyed the contract subject.

The government levied an impost on imported textiles.

The court convicted the impostor for identity theft and fraud.

The defendant was charged with imposture for assuming another's identity to commit fraud.

The court recognized the imposture as a basis for annulling the contract.

The police impounded the vehicle after it was involved in the accident.

The animal control officer impounded the stray dog found in the neighborhood.

The police ordered the impoundment of the suspect's vehicle after the arrest.

The president faced criticism over the impoundment of congressional funds.

The party invoked impracticability after unexpected supply chain disruptions made delivery impossible.

The attorney’s imprecation during the trial shocked the courtroom.

The defendant's alibi was impregnable, leaving no room for doubt.

The fortress was defended impregnably, leaving no room for legal challenge.

The doctor confirmed that the procedure was intended to impregnate the patient.

The contract was impregnated with clauses protecting intellectual property rights.

The case hinged on the timing of the impregnation in relation to the contract.

The impregnation of the wood with resin increased its durability.

The impresario negotiated contracts with performers and venues to ensure the success of the tour.

The creditor impressed a lien on the debtor’s goods.

The customs officer impressed the confiscation seal on the container.

The forensic expert examined the impression left on the weapon.

The witness's impression of the defendant influenced the jury's deliberation.

The trademark's impression was unlawfully used by the competitor.

The forensic team analyzed the tire tread as impression evidence to link the suspect's vehicle to the crime scene.

The attorney's impressive closing statement convinced the jury of her client’s innocence.

The government faced opposition due to the practice of impressment during wartime.

The Impressment Act enabled the navy to forcibly recruit sailors during wartime.

The official document bore the imprint of the government seal.

The legal text included the imprint of the publishing house on its title page.

The notary imprinted the seal on the contract to certify its validity.

The court decided to imprison the defendant for five years.

The defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for the crime.

Imprisonment is considered a severe form of punishment under criminal law.

The court found the witness's story improbable and thus gave it little weight.

The lawyer made an impromptu objection during the trial.

She spoke impromptu during the negotiation session.

The evidence was excluded because it was obtained through improper means.

The judge admonished the lawyer for making improper remarks during the trial.

The employee was terminated due to allegations of improper conduct during business transactions.

The contract was voided due to improper influence from a more powerful party.

The government audit uncovered numerous improper payments made to ineligible contractors.

Improper payments must be reported and corrected to maintain fiscal accountability.

The contract was improperly executed, rendering it voidable.

The judge noted the impropriety in the attorney's conduct during the trial.

There was an impropriety in the way the evidence was obtained, leading to its exclusion.

The owner improved the land by building a fence.

The parties agreed to improve the contract terms before signing.

The homeowner made an improvement by adding a new deck to the backyard.

The developer invested in improvements such as sidewalks and street lighting.

The court found the defendant's improvident disposal of assets contributed to the insolvency.

The defendant was charged with planting an improvised explosive device near the government building.

The defendant's imprudence in leaving hazardous materials unsecured led to the accident.

The defendant sought to impugn the credibility of the witness during cross-examination.

The defendant acted on impulse, which complicated the assessment of intent.

The market's impulse led the parties to renegotiate the contract swiftly.

The court considered whether the defendant's impulsive act negated intent.

The defendant acted impulsively, which the court weighed against premeditation.

The court considered the defendant's impulsiveness when evaluating his mens rea.

The defendant's impulsivity was considered in evaluating criminal responsibility.

The dictator ruled with impunity, never facing legal consequences for his actions.

The law imputes knowledge of the contract terms to both parties.

The court imputed negligence to the employer for the employee's actions.

An employer may bear imputed liability for an employee’s negligent acts committed within the scope of employment.