She accepted the job offer with a well-defined employment contract.

The contractor completed the job as specified in the agreement.

The company's HR department conducted a job analysis to ensure compliance with labor laws and to develop fair employment policies.

She submitted her job application online to be considered for the position.

The company conducted a thorough job assessment before extending a job offer.

The employee received a job assignment to complete the contract review by Friday.

The claimant visited the job center to apply for unemployment benefits after losing his job.

The company implemented a new job classification system to comply with labor regulations.

The employer provided a detailed job description outlining the employee's tasks and expectations.

The company conducted a job evaluation to revise its salary structure.

The company implemented job grading to ensure equitable pay among employees with similar responsibilities.

She accepted the job offer after reviewing the salary and benefits.

The company issued a job order specifying the materials and timeline for the project.

The court considered the evidence of job performance when determining wrongful termination claims.

The job placement agreement specified the agency's commission upon successful hiring.

The company implemented rigorous job screening procedures to comply with labor laws and ensure workplace safety.

She applied for jobless benefits after losing her job due to company downsizing.

The jobseeker applied for unemployment benefits after losing his position.

She applied for jobseeker's allowance to support herself while looking for a new job.

The jobseekers agreement requires the applicant to attend regular meetings and training sessions.

The court allowed the plaintiff to join multiple claims in a single lawsuit.

The defendant moved to join an additional party to the case.

The court granted joinder of the two defendants to streamline the proceedings.

Joinder is often necessary to avoid multiple lawsuits on the same matter.

The parties entered into a joint venture agreement.

They held joint ownership of the property.

The police raided the joint for illegal activity.

The parties engaged in a joint action to enforce the terms of the agreement.

The coalition executed a joint action authorized by the United Nations Security Council.

Under joint and several liability, the plaintiff can recover the full amount of damages from any one of the defendants.

The joint command coordinated the efforts of the army and navy during the operation.

The joint commission issued new guidelines for compliance with safety regulations.

The hospital sought accreditation from the Joint Commission to demonstrate its commitment to quality care.

The joint committee reviewed the proposed tax reforms before presenting them to both houses of Congress.

The regulatory agencies established a joint committee to investigate the environmental compliance breaches.

The union and management held a joint consultation before implementing the new workplace policy.

The court awarded joint custody to both parents to ensure shared decision-making for the child's welfare.

Under joint custody, both parents must agree on major decisions affecting the child.

The court scheduled a trial date for the joint defendants to answer the allegations.

The defendants entered into a joint defense agreement to collaborate on their lawsuit defense.

Both companies were held liable as joint employers for wage violations.

The court found joint employment due to shared control over the worker's job duties.

The countries entered into a joint implementation agreement to fund renewable energy projects.

The oil companies shared a joint interest in the drilling lease.

The parties acted in their joint interest to resolve the dispute amicably.

Under joint liability, each co-signer can be sued for the full amount of the debt.

The parties agreed to pursue joint litigation to consolidate their claims against the defendant.

Joint litigation helped reduce costs by combining similar cases into one proceeding.

The siblings incurred a joint obligation to repay the family loan, each liable for the full amount.

Under their joint obligation, the partners must act collectively to fulfill the contract terms.

The creditor can sue any joint obligor for the entire amount owed.

The couple held the house under joint ownership, so the survivor inherited it automatically.

Joint ownership requires clear agreement on each party’s rights and responsibilities to avoid disputes.

The married couple held joint possession of the family home.

Joint possession can affect the division of assets during a legal dispute.

The lawyer discussed the risks of joint representation before taking on both parties in the dispute.

Congress passed a joint resolution to authorize emergency funding.

The joint resolution declared a day of national remembrance.

The joint task force was established to coordinate efforts across agencies during the emergency response.

Upon the death of one joint tenant, the property automatically passes to the surviving joint tenants.

They bought the house as joint tenants with right of survivorship to ensure smooth transfer of ownership.

The court held that the joint tortfeasors were each responsible for compensating the plaintiff in full.

The court ordered a joint trial for the defendants involved in related criminal charges.

The companies formed a joint venture to develop the new technology.

The joint venture was registered as a separate entity under state law.

The companies signed a joint venture agreement to develop new technology together.

The joint-stock company issued shares to raise capital for its new manufacturing plant.

The defendants were found liable jointly for the damages.

The property was held jointly by the spouses.

The court clerk recorded the hearing details in the journal.

References to precedent are often found in legal journals.

Every financial transaction must be documented in the journal.

The accountant reviewed the journal entry documenting the contract payment.

The judge ordered a journal entry to be made summarizing the hearing's conclusions.

The magazine's journalism was scrutinized for potentially violating defamation laws.

Legal protections for journalism vary greatly across jurisdictions.

The journalist reported on the court case with accuracy and impartiality.

Journalistic ethics require reporters to verify information before publication to avoid libel.

The court recognized journalistic privilege and allowed the reporter to withhold the identity of the whistleblower.