A contract necessarily must have mutual agreement to be enforceable.

The violation necessarily results in liability for damages.

The contract's terms were necessarily implied to ensure fairness between the parties.

The contract clause was necessary to ensure compliance with the law.

The use of force was deemed necessary and proportionate in this case.

Proof of intent is a necessary condition for establishing criminal liability.

The court dismissed the case because the necessary party was not joined.

The defendant pleaded necessity to justify breaking the highway barrier during the emergency.

Access to legal counsel is a necessity in criminal proceedings.

The defendant invoked the necessity defense to justify breaking into the cabin during the storm.

The defendant invoked the necessity doctrine to justify breaking into the cabin to avoid freezing to death.

Under the necessity doctrine, the court considered whether the defendant’s illegal act was justified to save lives.

The defendant gave a negative response to the plaintiff's allegations.

A negative covenant restricts the parties from certain actions in contract law.

The witness's negative contradicted the plaintiff's version of events.

The lease included a negative covenant prohibiting tenants from subletting the property without consent.

The defendant asserted a negative defense by denying all allegations in the complaint.

The court found the defendant guilty of neglect for failing to maintain safe premises.

He was accused of neglecting his fiduciary duties to the corporation.

The officer was charged with neglect of duty for not responding to the emergency call.

The driver was found liable due to negligence in failing to stop at the red light.

The driver was found negligent for not stopping at the red light.

He was charged with negligent homicide after the fatal car accident.

The plaintiff sued for negligent infliction of emotional distress after witnessing the accident caused by the defendant.

The plaintiff sued for negligent misrepresentation after relying on the inaccurate financial report provided by the defendant.

The consultant was liable for a negligent misstatement that led to the client's financial loss.

The defendant acted negligently by leaving the hazardous condition unmarked.

The negotiability of the promissory note allowed it to be freely traded among investors.

The check is negotiable and can be cashed by the bearer.

The terms of the contract are negotiable before signing.

The bank accepted the negotiable instrument as valid payment for the loan.

He endorsed the negotiable instrument to his supplier to settle the amount owed.

The parties negotiated the terms of the contract for several weeks.

The government agency preferred negotiated bidding for the complex infrastructure project to clarify specifications.

The parties executed a negotiated contract after several rounds of discussions.

The negotiation between the buyer and seller lasted several days before they finalized the contract.

Negotiation is often encouraged to avoid the costs of going to court.

The negotiation protocol outlined the steps both parties must follow to reach an agreement.

The lawyer developed a negotiation strategy to secure favorable terms for her client.

The negotiator successfully brokered the settlement between the two parties.

The city council proposed new regulations affecting the historic neighborhood.

The council held a public hearing to discuss zoning changes in the neighbourhood.

The court debated whether the defendant's claim met the standards of Nelsonian knowledge.

The court applied the nemo judex in causa sua principle to disqualify the biased judge.

The hospital is required to report the birth of every neonate to the local authorities.

The defendant was charged with neonaticide for the death of her infant shortly after delivery.

The company's hiring practices were scrutinized for nepotism after several family members were appointed to senior positions without proper qualifications.

The employee's net salary is what they receive after taxes are deducted.

The contract stipulates that the net profits will be shared equally between the parties.

The mutual fund's net asset value is calculated daily to determine the price per share.

The company's net assets increased significantly after repaying its debts.

The government's economic report highlighted an increase in the net domestic product this fiscal year.

The company's net income increased significantly this fiscal year due to higher sales.

The company's net loss this quarter triggered an audit by regulatory authorities.

The company's net margin improved significantly following the restructuring, indicating better profitability.

The government enacted regulations enforcing net neutrality to prevent ISPs from blocking or throttling certain websites.

The company reported a net operating loss of $2 million, which it carried forward to reduce tax liability in subsequent years.

The company filed a net operating loss carryback to recover taxes paid in prior years.

The company utilized its net operating loss carryforward to offset taxable income in subsequent years.

Her net pay increased after the company raised the salary.

The contractor received the net pay after all expenses were deducted.

The contract specified how the net profit would be shared among the partners.

Inventory is recorded at net realizable value to reflect its true economic worth.

The contract specifies that royalties will be calculated based on net revenue rather than gross sales.

The invoice states net terms of 30 days, meaning payment is due within 30 days of the invoice date.

The court calculated the net total damages owed to the plaintiff after all offsets.

The acquisition deal hinged on the target company's net working capital being above a specified threshold.

The court evaluated the defendant's net worth to determine damages.

The company netted a substantial profit after the lawsuit was settled.

The parties agreed to netting the amounts owed to simplify their financial transactions.

Netting reduces counterparty risk in derivatives trading by offsetting mutual obligations.

The parties executed a netting agreement to reduce their multiple payment obligations to a single net amount.

The attorney built a network of contacts to aid in cross-jurisdictional cases.

The company strengthened its network security to comply with data protection laws.

The contract specified liability for damages caused by faulty network equipment.

The company invested heavily in upgrading its network facilities to improve service reliability.

Network facilities must comply with industry standards to ensure fair access for all providers.

The company upgraded its network infrastructure to comply with new cybersecurity laws.

The company adopted network marketing to expand its sales reach through independent distributors.

Regulators scrutinize network marketing practices to ensure compliance with consumer protection laws.

The regulator enforced network neutrality to prevent ISPs from throttling video streaming services.

The network operator must adhere to the data privacy regulations when handling user information.

As a licensed network operator, the company is subject to periodic audits by the telecom regulator.

The network provider must ensure data privacy according to telecommunications laws.

The company implemented robust network security to comply with data protection regulations.

The telecom company is obligated to ensure uninterrupted network service to its subscribers.

The parties entered into a network service agreement outlining service levels and liabilities.

The contract included provisions on network sharing to ensure all parties had equal access to the system resources.

The expert witness testified on the defendant's neurological condition to assess criminal responsibility.

The court ordered a neuropsychological assessment to evaluate the defendant's mental state at the time of the offense.

The court ordered a neuropsychological evaluation to assess the defendant's mental capacity to stand trial.

The plaintiff claimed damages for neurotrauma sustained in the car accident.

The mediator remained neutral throughout the negotiation.

A neutral party must not influence the outcome of the arbitration.

The defendant argued their method was neutral and did not infringe on any patent.

During the war, the neutral state refused to allow its territory to be used for military operations.

Switzerland has long been regarded as a neutral state under international law.

The treaty designated the border zone as neutral territory to prevent military activity by either side.

The treaty established a neutral zone where neither side could deploy troops.

The neutral zone between the two properties is subject to shared maintenance obligations.

The country's neutrality was recognized during the war, preventing it from joining either side.

Judicial neutrality is essential to ensure a fair trial.

Net neutrality laws prohibit ISPs from blocking lawful content or throttling bandwidth.

The judge ruled neutrally to ensure fairness for both parties.

The defendant was late to court; nevertheless, the judge allowed the testimony.

The pharmaceutical company submitted clinical data to obtain approval for the new drug.

The pharmaceutical company filed a new drug application with the FDA to obtain marketing authorization.

The Supreme Court's rulings reflected a shift toward new federalism, granting states greater control over education policy.

The HR department prepared the new hire paperwork to ensure compliance with labor laws.

The New Start Treaty mandates limits on deployed strategic nuclear arsenals of the U.S. and Russia.

The appellate court awarded a new trial due to prejudicial statements made by a witness.

Parties to the dispute relied on the New York Convention to enforce the arbitration award abroad.

The law grants newborns certain protections regarding medical care and parental rights.

The court's decision established newly recognized rights for indigenous peoples regarding land use.

The law firm issued a monthly newsletter to inform clients about recent regulatory changes.

The hospital contacted the deceased's next of kin to inform them of the situation.

The court found a sufficient nexus between the defendant's actions and the jurisdiction to proceed with the case.

The contract served as the nexus of all obligations between the parties.