The government implemented e-voting to increase voter turnout and streamline election results.

The legislature passed new regulations to ensure the integrity of e-voting systems.

The corporation attempted to evade taxes through complex offshore schemes.

He was charged with attempting to evade arrest after fleeing the police on foot.

The court will evaluate the validity of the contract based on the presented evidence.

The expert was called to evaluate the damages caused by the breach of contract.

The court conducted an evaluation of the damages claimed by the plaintiff.

An evaluation of the estate was required before probate proceedings could continue.

The evaluation criteria outlined in the tender document ensured transparent and fair selection of the contractor.

The contract includes a six-month evaluation period before renewal.

During the evaluation period, the investor reviews all financial disclosures.

The court appointed an evaluator to determine the fair market value of the disputed property.

The evaluator assessed the credibility of the witness testimony during the mediation.

The court considered the evanescent nature of the witness's memory when evaluating her testimony.

The company was charged with tax evasion after hiding income from authorities.

His evasion of arrest led to additional charges.

The contract was terminated upon the occurrence of a specified event.

The event of default allowed the creditor to accelerate the loan repayment.

Under event law, the signing of a contract creates binding obligations for the parties involved.

Event law determines when an act constitutes breach of contract.

The organizers obtained an event permit from the city before hosting the outdoor concert.

Event regulation ensures that shareholder meetings adhere to legal notice requirements.

Event regulation dictates when a breach of contract constitutes grounds for termination.

The plaintiff presented a clear event sequence to establish the defendant's liability.

The Every Student Succeeds Act provides states with more flexibility in designing their education standards and assessments.

The landlord sought to evict the tenant for nonpayment of rent.

The tenant faced eviction after several months of unpaid rent.

The landlord served an eviction notice after the tenant failed to pay rent for two months.

The tenant received an eviction notice as the first step toward legal eviction proceedings.

The landlord obtained an eviction order to remove the tenant who failed to pay rent for three months.

The lawyer submitted the evidence to support her client's innocence.

The confession was considered strong evidence of guilt.

The judge ruled on the evidence admissibility before the trial commenced.

The judge ruled that the evidence admission was proper under the rules of evidence.

The lawyer's success depended largely on thorough evidence analysis.

The judge performed an evidence assessment before ruling on the admissibility of the documents.

The attorney requested a formal evidence assessment to strengthen the case.

The lawyer presented evidence authentication to confirm the document's legitimacy.

Proper evidence authentication is required to ensure the item can be considered by the judge.

The trial judge emphasized the importance of proper evidence classification to assess its admissibility.

Evidence classification helped the attorneys organize their case by separating testimonial from physical evidence.

The judge ruled certain testimony inadmissible under the state’s evidence code.

Proper evidence collection is crucial to ensure admissibility in court.

The attorneys engaged in evidence discovery to obtain relevant documents and witness testimonies before trial.

The judge emphasized rigorous evidence evaluation before ruling on the admissibility of the document.

The court ruled in favor of evidence exclusion because the evidence was obtained unlawfully.

Evidence exclusion serves to uphold defendants’ constitutional rights.

The attorney emphasized the importance of thorough evidence gathering before the trial.

Proper evidence labeling is crucial to ensure items are admissible in court.

The judge ruled that the evidence law required the admission of the witness's testimony.

The attorney reviewed the evidence list before trial to ensure all items were included.

The detective maintained an evidence log to track all items recovered at the crime scene.

Proper evidence management is crucial to maintaining the chain of custody in criminal trials.

The attorney’s evidence presentation was critical in convincing the jury of the defendant’s guilt.

The detective emphasized the importance of evidence preservation to avoid contamination at the crime scene.

Proper evidence preservation includes creating forensic images of digital data to prevent spoliation.

The court admitted the evidence because it had been collected in strict accordance with the evidence protocol.

The parties agreed to the evidence protocol to streamline discovery and avoid disputes.

The attorney reviewed the evidence record before cross-examining the witness.

The judge examined the evidence record to ensure all exhibits were properly admitted.

The judge assessed the evidence reliability before admitting the expert testimony.

The judge reviewed the evidence report before making a ruling.

The evidence rules dictate what material the court can consider during the trial.

The forensic analyst used evidence sampling to test a portion of the seized materials.

The attorney completed the evidence submission before the trial began.

The court granted a motion for evidence suppression due to the illegal search conducted by police.

Proper evidence tagging is essential to maintaining the chain of custody and preventing evidence tampering.

The defendant was charged with evidence tampering after attempting to delete crucial files from the computer.

The committee advocated for evidence-based law to improve the effectiveness of criminal statutes.

Judges increasingly rely on evidence-based law to ensure fair outcomes backed by data.

The plaintiff argued that the doctor's failure to follow evidence-based medicine led to malpractice.

The court adopted evidence-based practice to ensure rulings were supported by empirical data.

The lawyer presented evidentiary documents to support the client's claim.

The lawyer submitted the document as an evidentiary aid to support her client's claim.

The attorney conducted an evidentiary analysis to assess which documents would most strongly support the client's case.

The judge cautioned the jury to be aware of evidentiary bias that might distort their evaluation of the facts.

The evidentiary fact that the defendant was at the scene supports the prosecution's case.

The judge scheduled an evidentiary hearing to determine the admissibility of the disputed documents.

The court followed the proper evidentiary procedure before admitting the documentary proof.

The judge ruled that the document had evidentiary relevance to the breach of contract claim.

The court scrutinized the evidentiary reliability before admitting the forensic report into evidence.

The attorney submitted the evidentiary report to bolster the case with documented proof.

The judge ruled that the evidence was inadmissible under the evidentiary rule against hearsay.

The plaintiff failed to meet the evidentiary standard necessary to prove negligence.

The evidentiary statement was submitted to support the plaintiff's claim.

The evidentiary value of the witness’s testimony was crucial to the verdict.

The judge excluded the claim due to evidentiary weakness in the plaintiff’s testimony.