The plaintiff filed an as-applied challenge arguing that the statute infringed their rights under the specific facts of their case.

The court ascribed the breach of contract to the defendant's negligence.

The signature was ascribed to the plaintiff in the document dispute.

The attorney's aside helped the judge understand the procedural issue.

The plaintiff asked the court for an injunction.

Her ask was for compensation due to breach of contract.

The stock's ask price rose after the positive earnings report.

The asking price for the house was set higher than the market value.

The assailant was apprehended by the police immediately after the attack.

The defendant was charged with assault after threatening the victim.

The victim suffered bruises from the assault.

He assaulted the officer during the arrest.

He was charged with assault and battery for attacking the man in the bar.

The plaintiff filed a suit for assault and battery seeking damages for the injuries suffered.

The shareholders assembled to vote on the merger proposal.

The attorney assembled the necessary documents for trial.

The state assembly passed the new law after extensive debate.

The assembly of documents was critical for the contract review.

The assembly law dictates how members may introduce bills and conduct votes during sessions.

The organizers obtained an assembly permit before staging the public protest.

The union invoked its assembly rights to organize a peaceful protest on company premises.

The contract was valid only after both parties gave their assent.

The party assented to the terms of the settlement.

The plaintiff asserted that the defendant breached the contract.

The attorney asserted the client's right to a fair trial.

The plaintiff's assertion that the contract was breached was supported by evidence.

The witness gave an assertion in lieu of swearing an oath.

The plaintiff provided an assertion of fact to support her claim in court.

The attorney took an assertive stance during the negotiation to protect the client's interests.

The attorney argued assertively to protect her client’s interests.

The attorney's assertiveness in court helped secure a favorable settlement for her client.

The court will assess the damages owed to the plaintiff.

The judge needs to assess the credibility of the witness.

The tax authority conducted an assessment of the property's value.

The city imposed an assessment to fund the new public park.

The taxpayer filed an assessment appeal after disputing the city's property tax valuation.

Her legal counsel advised her to submit an assessment appeal to contest the fee charged by the agency.

The county initiated the assessment collection to ascertain property taxes owed by residents.

The homeowners' association began assessment collection to pay for community repairs.

The assessment criteria for contract performance were clearly outlined in the agreement.

The court applied strict assessment criteria to determine the defendant's responsibility.

The regulatory body implemented a new assessment framework to ensure consistent evaluations of environmental impact reports.

The policy makers adopted an assessment framework to measure the effectiveness of new labor laws.

The company must submit its financial data for the assessment period defined by the tax authority.

The income earned in the financial year 2022-23 is reported in the assessment year 2023-24.

The assessor arrived to appraise the value of the property for tax calculation.

The insurance assessor reviewed the damage report before approving the claim.

The company's assets include cash, equipment, and real estate.

The trustee liquidated the debtor's assets to pay creditors.

The asset account was credited to reflect the purchase of new equipment.

The company pursued an asset acquisition to expand its product line without assuming the target's liabilities.

The trust's asset allocation must align with the beneficiary's best interests under applicable law.

The bank provides asset custody services to institutional investors to secure their holdings.

The politician submitted her asset declaration to comply with ethics laws.

The asset declaration included bank accounts, real estate, and investments.

During the lawsuit, the plaintiff conducted asset discovery to locate the defendant's property.

The court found evidence of asset dissipation when the defendant rapidly sold valuable property shortly before the trial.

The court supervised the asset distribution to ensure all creditors were paid fairly.

The asset evaluation was critical in the divorce settlement to ensure fair division of property.

The police initiated asset forfeiture to confiscate the proceeds of the drug trafficking operation.

The company faced asset forfeiture after violating environmental laws.

The court issued an asset freeze to prevent the defendant from dissipating funds until the trial concluded.

The company recorded an asset impairment loss after the market value of its property declined significantly.

Through asset isolation, the company shielded certain properties from potential lawsuits.

The bank's asset liability management strategy reduced its exposure to interest rate fluctuations.

The court approved the asset liquidation to pay off outstanding debts.

The company undertook asset liquidation to fund its new business venture.

The asset liquidity of certain real estate holdings is low compared to stocks.

The trustee reviewed the asset listing to determine the debtor’s financial holdings.

The firm specializes in asset management for high-net-worth individuals.

Asset management in the trust requires adherence to the beneficiary's instructions and relevant laws.

The asset management company oversees the pension fund's investments to maximize returns while managing risk.

The asset manager advised the trust on diversifying its investment portfolio to minimize risk.

The accountant was charged with asset misappropriation after diverting company funds to a personal account.

The company implemented asset partition to protect its core assets from the creditors of its subsidiaries.

Asset partition ensures that investors retain rights to the collateral even if the originator goes bankrupt.

The law required the full disclosure of the client's asset portfolio for accurate tax reporting.

The lawyer advised on effective asset preservation to safeguard the client's wealth during litigation.

The company implemented asset protection to shield its funds from potential lawsuits.

The company completed an asset purchase to acquire the target firm's equipment and inventory without assuming its debts.

The parties signed an asset purchase agreement to transfer ownership of the company's equipment and inventory.

The court approved the asset recovery plan to return embezzled funds to the victims.

The company performed an asset revaluation to update its balance sheet in accordance with market conditions.

The company completed an asset sale to divest its manufacturing equipment.

The company used asset securitization to raise capital by selling mortgage-backed securities.

The fiduciary implemented asset segregation to shield client funds from the firm's liabilities.

Investment advisers must comply with asset segregation rules to safeguard investor property.

The court ordered the asset seizure to recover the unpaid debt.

Asset seizure was carried out after the investigation revealed illegal proceeds.

The lawyer employed asset tracing to locate the defendant's hidden funds abroad.

The asset transfer was finalized after both parties signed the agreement.

During the merger, several asset transfers were conducted to streamline the new company's portfolio.

The court ordered an independent asset valuation to resolve the dispute between the parties.

Accurate asset valuation is essential for equitable distribution among creditors.

The company arranged asset-backed financing to improve its cash flow without issuing new equity.

The investor purchased asset-backed securities backed by a portfolio of auto loans.

The company obtained asset-based lending to improve its cash flow while leveraging its inventory as collateral.

She assigned her lease to a new tenant.

The judge assigned the case to a different court.

The assignability of this lease depends on the landlord's prior consent.

The assignable rights under the contract were clearly detailed in the agreement.

The lawyer noted the assignation of the deadline for submissions.

The assignation between the parties was scrutinized as evidence of collusion.

The defendant was represented by assigned counsel during the trial.

The assignee received the rights to the patent under the assignment agreement.

The assignee assumed the obligations originally owed by the assignor.

The assignment of the lease was completed with the landlord's consent.

The assignment of contractual duties must comply with the original agreement’s terms.

The parties executed an assignment agreement to transfer the lease rights to the new tenant.

The hospital requested an assignment of benefits to bill the insurance company directly.

The assignment of benefits allowed the contractor to receive payment directly from the client’s insurer.

The assignment of claims must be in writing to be enforceable.

The creditor executed an assignment of claims to a third party as part of the debt sale.

The landlord must approve the assignment of lease before the new tenant can take possession.

The assignment of rights in the lease requires the landlord's consent.

He signed the assignment of rights for the patent to the corporation.

The assignment of securities must be properly documented to be enforceable.

Through the assignment of securities, the beneficiary gained entitlement to dividend payments.

The assignor conveyed his lease rights to the assignee through a written agreement.

The attorney assisted the client in preparing the contract.

He was charged for assisting in the fraudulent scheme.

The defendant sought legal assistance to prepare for trial.

She received housing assistance from the local authority.

The federal assistance program helps low-income families afford housing.

Eligibility criteria for the assistance program were established by statute.

The judge's assistant prepared the case files for the hearing.

The family chose assisted living for their elderly parent to ensure safety and help with medication management.

The assisted living facility ensures residents receive help with medication management and meal preparation while maintaining independence.

The court examined whether the defendant’s actions constituted assisted suicide under the applicable statute.

The court ordered the provision of an assistive communication device to facilitate the witness’s testimony.

The law mandates the provision of assistive technology to students with disabilities to ensure equal access to education.

The Assistive Technology Act outlines federal funding to support state programs providing assistive technology.

The Assistive Technology Act provides grants to states for supporting assistive technology programs.

She worked as an associate at a prestigious law firm.

The associate handled the case under the supervision of a partner.

The parties agreed to associate in a joint venture.

The associate counsel reviewed the contract before the senior partner's approval.

The company retained an associate counsel to assist with regulatory compliance issues.

She earned an associate degree before applying for the paralegal certification.

The judge allowed the associated counsel to present evidence during the trial.

The nonprofit association was formed to advocate for environmental protection.

The association between the contractor and the supplier was documented in the agreement.

The two countries signed an association agreement to facilitate trade and political cooperation.

Members must pay their association dues annually to retain voting rights.

Association governance ensures that member interests are represented in decision-making.

Effective association governance is critical to maintaining legal compliance and organizational transparency.

The association law requires associations to maintain transparent accounting records.

The company assumed liability for all environmental damages.

She assumed the office of executor after the will was probated.

The court assumed jurisdiction over the case.

The company registered its assumed name to operate under a more marketable brand.

The defendant filed the lawsuit under an assumed name to maintain anonymity.

The assumption of the lease transferred all tenant obligations to the new lessee.

The contract was drafted on the assumption that all permits would be obtained on time.

The court ruled that the defendant's assumption of risk barred recovery for injuries sustained during the hazardous sport.

The company gave assurance that the product met all safety standards.

The car insurance policy is a type of assurance protecting against accident losses.

The trustee offered assurance that all beneficiaries would receive their fair shares.

The contract assures the buyer of delivery within 30 days.

The insurer assures compensation in case of loss.

His thesis on astrojurisprudence explored the influence of celestial bodies on judicial decision-making in historical contexts.

International treaties govern the use and ownership of astronomical objects like asteroids and moons.

She sought asylum to escape political persecution in her home country.

The patient was admitted to an asylum for treatment.

The applicant filed an asylum application to seek refuge from political persecution.

The asylum hearing was scheduled to evaluate the applicant's claim of persecution.

Under asylum law, applicants must prove a well-founded fear of persecution.

The asylum procedure determines whether the applicant qualifies for refugee status under international law.

Due process in the asylum procedure ensures fairness in assessing the claimant's eligibility.

The asylum seeker requested protection upon arrival at the border.

Asymmetric encryption protects client data during transmission in compliance with data privacy laws.

The conflict was characterized by asymmetric warfare, with guerrilla tactics employed against a conventional army.

The court examined the asymmetry of information between the contracting parties.

Asymmetry in federal arrangements can lead to differing legal rights among states.

The parties communicated in an asynchronous manner, exchanging messages over several days.