The lawyer made a compelling oral argument before the appellate court.

Oral argument allows judges to ask questions and clarify points in the case.

The parties formed an oral contract during their meeting, agreeing on the sale terms verbally.

The court relied heavily on the oral evidence provided by the eyewitness.

The attorney prepared carefully for the oral examination of the key witness.

The plaintiff sued for negligence in the oral surgery performed without informed consent.

The court admitted the witness's oral testimony as crucial to the case.

The lawyer's oration in court emphasized the defendant's innocence.

The orator passionately presented his argument before the jury.

The lawyer's oratory persuaded the jury to acquit the defendant.

The court determined the case was outside its orbit of jurisdiction.

The easement fell within the orbit of the landowner's rights.

The firm's orchestration of the merger ensured all regulatory approvals were secured on time.

The judge issued an order requiring the defendant to appear in court.

An order was entered to stay the proceedings pending further review.

The order of precedence determines which laws apply in case of conflict.

The court ordered the company to pay damages.

The judge issued an order amendment to clarify the terms of the custody arrangement.

Traders analyzed the order book to gauge market sentiment before placing a trade.

The court issued an order for delivery requiring the seller to dispatch the items within ten days.

The judge granted an order modification to extend the deadline for discovery.

The parents requested an order modification to change the custody schedule due to relocation.

The chairman followed the established order of business to ensure the meeting proceeded smoothly.

The Order of Chivalry was granted special legal privileges by the crown.

The court issued an order of dismissal due to lack of jurisdiction.

He was inducted into the ancient order of knighthood by the monarch.

The medieval Order of Knights had distinct legal rights granted by the crown.

The order of knights was treated as a legal person in the property dispute.

The committee published an order of merit to determine eligibility for the scholarship.

She was inducted into the Order of Merit for her contributions to national security.

The contract specified the order of performance to avoid disputes between parties.

The victim obtained an order of protection against the alleged abuser.

She filed for an order of protection after receiving threatening messages.

The court issued an order of sale to seize and sell the debtor's property.

The auction proceeded according to the order of sale published beforehand.

The FDIC exercises its powers under the orderly liquidation authority to resolve a failing bank efficiently.

The statute was identified by its ordinal number in the legal code.

The city council passed a new ordinance to regulate parking in downtown areas.

The king issued an ordinance mandating military service for all able-bodied men.

The city established a new team to improve ordinance enforcement in public parks.

The homeowner faced a fine for an ordinance violation due to unauthorized construction.

The court ordinarily requires a written motion before granting a hearing.

The court considered the ordinariness of the contract terms when determining enforceability.

The case was resolved through ordinary administrative processes.

The dispute was brought before an ordinary court rather than a specialized tribunal.

The accountant confirmed that advertising fees were ordinary and necessary expenses for the company.

Organ allocation protocols ensure fair distribution of available organs to patients on transplant waiting lists.

The hospital revised its organ allocation policy to prioritize patients based on medical urgency and time on the waiting list.

The organ bank ensured all donated kidneys were properly matched and distributed to patients on the waiting list.

The law requires explicit consent for organ donation to proceed.

The hospital contacted the organ donor registry to facilitate a transplant.

The hospital checked the organ donor list to find a suitable match for the patient awaiting a kidney transplant.

The organ procurement organization ensured all donated kidneys were allocated according to federal law.

The court reviewed the legality of the organ transplant performed without proper consent.

Organ transplant law sets the legal framework for the ethical distribution of donor organs.

Organ transplant law protects the rights of both donors and recipients during organ transfer.

The new laws on organ transplantation aim to prevent illegal organ trade.

The organisation entered into a contract to provide public services.

The organisation's governance structure complies with regulatory requirements.

The organization must comply with all regulatory filing requirements.

Effective organization of staff improved the firm's productivity.

Organization law requires corporations to adhere to standards for board governance and shareholder rights.

Understanding organizational behavior is essential for drafting effective corporate policies that ensure legal compliance.

The board amended the organizational bylaws to clarify voting protocols.

The lawyer reviewed the company's organizational chart to understand decision-making authority.

The nonprofit's organizational charter outlines its mission and board responsibilities.

The law firm's organizational culture emphasized pro bono work and ethical practice.

A strong organizational culture can reduce legal risks through improved internal controls.

The corporation filed its organizational documents with the state to formalize its legal existence.

The choice of an organizational form affects a company's tax obligations and liability exposure.

Effective organizational governance ensures transparency and accountability within corporations.

The corporate bylaws outlined the organizational hierarchy to clarify decision-making authority.

Organizational law requires corporate bylaws to be consistent with state statutes.

Understanding organizational law is essential for drafting effective partnership agreements.

The company faced organizational liability for the fraudulent actions committed by its executives.

Organizational liability may result from contractual breaches or regulatory violations at the corporate level.

Effective organizational management ensures compliance with regulatory requirements and internal governance policies.

Her organizational membership entitles her to participate in board decisions.

The company faced penalties due to organizational misconduct involving fraudulent reporting.

The company updated its organizational policy to enhance employee data privacy protections.

The organizational policy mandates strict adherence to anti-corruption laws.

The company’s organizational readiness was assessed before rolling out the new regulatory framework.

The organizational structure of the corporation dictates the flow of decision-making and accountability.

The court applied the organizational test to decide if the entity met the requirements for tax exemption.

The law firm helped the client organize a new corporation under state law.

Law enforcement agencies prioritize combating organized crime to dismantle illicit networks.

The defendant was charged under the RICO Act for participating in organized crime.

The regulator granted the firm permission to operate an organized trading facility for derivatives trading.

The organizer of the charity event ensured all permits were obtained.

The organizer was required to file a statement regarding the debtor's assets.

The new employees attended a legal orientation session to understand compliance requirements.

The surveyor confirmed the property's orientation relative to municipal zoning lines.

The orientation program outlined the company's compliance standards and workplace ethics.

The origin of the dispute was traced back to a contract amendment.

The appeal was transferred from the court of origin to a higher tribunal.

The origin country of the imported goods must be declared to comply with customs regulations.

The import was detained due to incorrect origin labeling on the packaging.

The origin marking on the goods clarified their country of manufacture for customs purposes.

The origin of goods affects tariffs and import restrictions applied by customs authorities.

The court requested the original contract for verification.

The lawyer submitted the original as evidence in court.

The contract was awarded based on the original budget, which set the limits for expenditures.

The court requested the original document to verify the signatures.

The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in cases involving ambassadors.

District courts generally exercise original jurisdiction over federal criminal trials.

The original right to possess the property was established before any subsequent conveyances.

The judge applied originalism to determine the meaning of the constitutional provision.

The originality of the work was key to securing its copyright protection.

The originator of the loan packaged it for sale in the secondary market.

The mortgage originator transferred the loans to the special purpose vehicle.

The trademark application was rejected due to excessive ornamentation that confused consumers.

The court's decision reflected the orthodoxy of existing constitutional law.

The court deemed the prior conviction orthogonal to the current charges, thus inadmissible as evidence.

The contract includes orthogonal clauses that govern payment independently from liability issues.

The court ruled that the two regulatory frameworks operate orthogonally, without overlapping jurisdiction.

The orthographic accuracy of a contract ensures no ambiguity in its terms.

The orthography of legal documents must be precise to avoid misinterpretation.