The trademark's distinct shade of blue helped establish its recognition in court.

The court considered the shade cast by the new construction in the property dispute.

The court investigated the shadow ownership behind the corporation.

The shadow director was held liable alongside the appointed directors.

The Shadow Cabinet proposed alternative legislative reforms to counter the government's policy.

The defendant hired a shadow counsel to oversee the trial strategy discreetly.

The court found that he was a shadow director and thus liable for the company's debts.

The government introduced measures to reduce the size of the shadow economy and increase tax revenues.

Workers in the shadow labor market often lack legal protections and benefits.

The jury's conviction was sustained because the defendant was not even within a shadow of doubt regarding his guilt.

The lessee shall pay rent on the first day of each month.

The court shall issue its ruling within 30 days.

The contract was declared void because it was a sham transaction designed to evade taxes.

The parties entered into a sham agreement with no real intent to perform.

The court declared the agreement a sham transaction and refused to enforce it.

The court applied the sham transaction doctrine to invalidate the contrived sale designed to evade taxes.

The court’s ruling caused considerable shame to the corporation for its unethical practices.

She owns 100 shares of the company.

The partners share the profits equally.

The share acquisition led to a controlling interest in the target company.

The share assignment was duly executed to transfer the shareholder's rights to the buyer.

The company announced a share buy-back to increase shareholder value.

The company announced a share buyback program to increase shareholder value.

The investor exercised their share call to prevent dilution during the new funding round.

The company increased its share capital to finance expansion.

She presented her share certificate as proof of her stock ownership.

The company’s new stock issuance caused significant share dilution for early investors.

The company announced a share issuance to fund its expansion projects.

The company recorded a significant share premium on its latest stock issuance.

The company recorded a large credit in the share premium reserve after issuing shares above their par value.

The parties executed the share purchase to transfer the stock ownership.

The investor completed a share purchase to gain controlling interest.

The parties signed the share purchase agreement to complete the acquisition of the company.

The share purchase agreement included warranties concerning the target company's financial status.

The board approved a share repurchase to increase shareholder value.

The share transfer was recorded with the company registrar to formalize the new ownership.

The shareholders agreed to include share transfer restrictions to control new ownership.

The parties had a shared interest in the success of the joint venture.

The attorney disclosed any shared interest that might affect his impartiality.

The partners faced shared liability for the debts incurred by the business.

Under shared liability, each guarantor could be pursued for full repayment of the loan.

The contract detailed the terms for managing the shared resources between the two companies.

The shareholder voted on the proposed merger during the annual meeting.

The shareholder agreement specifies the procedure for transferring shares.

The shareholder agreement includes provisions on voting rights and board appointments.

The merger could not proceed without shareholder consent.

The shareholder contribution helped the startup avoid bankruptcy during its early phase.

Shareholder contributions can affect the company’s capitalization and voting structure.

A shareholder corporation issues stock to raise capital and distribute ownership among investors.

The shareholder derivative lawsuit alleged that the company’s board members violated their fiduciary duties, causing financial harm to the corporation.

The shareholder derivative suit alleged that the board members misappropriated corporate funds.

The company faced a shareholder dispute over the election of the board members.

The shareholder distribution was declared after the company reported a strong fiscal year.

The company's shareholder equity increased due to retained earnings.

The company's shareholder funds increased significantly after the latest profitable quarter.

The shareholder interest in the company determines the proportion of profits they are entitled to receive.

Shareholder interest influences decisions made at the annual general meeting.

The shareholder lawsuit alleged that the company’s executives misappropriated funds.

In most cases, shareholder liability is limited to the amount they invested in the company.

The court imposed shareholder liability because the shareholders were found to have committed fraud.

The shareholder litigation alleged that the board violated their fiduciary duties by approving the merger without proper disclosure.

The company recorded the shareholder loan as a liability on its balance sheet.

The startup secured additional capital through a shareholder loan rather than issuing new shares.

The shareholder meeting was convened to approve the merger agreement.

At the annual shareholder meeting, the board presented the company's financial performance.

The minority shareholders alleged shareholder oppression when excluded from key decisions.

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff due to demonstrated shareholder oppression.

The shareholder register must be updated after each share transfer.

The shareholders submitted a resolution to require the company to report on its environmental impact.

Shareholder rights ensure investors can vote on key corporate decisions.

The shareholder vote approved the merger agreement.

The results of the shareholder vote were announced at the annual meeting.

The shareholder's interest increased after the company issued a stock dividend.

Her shareholder's interest was significantly affected by the company's restructuring.

The shareholders' agreement specifies how decisions are made and shares transferred.

The shareholders' equity increased significantly after the company reported higher retained earnings.

The shareholders' meeting approved the annual budget and elected new board members.

The shareholders' resolution approved the merger agreement.

The court applied principles of sharia law in its judgment on family inheritance.

The loan shark demanded repayment with exorbitant interest rates.

The legal shark exploited loopholes to win cases unfairly.

The loan shark charged exorbitant interest rates often considered illegal.

The forensic expert testified that the victim's wounds were consistent with sharp force trauma.

Please sign the attendance sheet before entering the courtroom.

The lawyer reviewed the balance sheet during the audit.

The composer registered the sheet music to secure copyright protection.

Investors often buy a shelf company to speed up the process of starting a new business.

The investigators uncovered that the funds were routed through several shell companies to conceal their origin.

Establishing a shell company allowed the investor to protect their identity during the acquisition.

The disaster victims found shelter in the community center.

The agency shelters homeless individuals during extreme weather.

Certain transactions benefit from tax shelter provisions to reduce liability.

The shelter law ensured that homeless individuals received temporary housing during winter.

The sheriff arrested the suspect and booked him into the county jail.

The sheriff served the eviction notice to the tenant as instructed by the court.

The sheriff's office investigated the burglary and arrested the suspect.

The debtor's house was sold at a sheriff's sale to satisfy the outstanding mortgage debt.

The Sherman Act is crucial in maintaining competitive markets by outlawing monopolies.

The Sherman Antitrust Act was used to break up monopolies in the early 20th century.

The defendant claimed diplomatic shield to avoid prosecution.

The company used the corporate shield to limit shareholder liability.

The lawyer sought to shield her client from damaging testimony.

The reporter relied on the shield law to refuse revealing their source in court.

The company offers a shift differential to employees working the overnight shift.

The labor contract includes provisions to protect workers engaged in shift work from excessive fatigue.

The auctioneer was exposed for using a shill to inflate the bidding prices.

The ship was registered under the flag of Panama.

The company ships all orders within 48 hours.

The ship captain ensured all safety protocols were followed during the voyage.

Ship registration is required for a vessel to engage in commercial activities under a country's flag.

The ship registration process includes submitting ownership and safety documentation.

The captain presented the ship registration certificate to customs officials upon docking.

Without a valid ship registration certificate, the vessel could be detained by port authorities.

The ship registry confirmed the vessel’s compliance with international safety standards.

The ship’s log was submitted as evidence in the maritime accident investigation.

The contract for the shipbuilding project included specific compliance with international maritime safety standards.

The shipmaster is liable for ensuring compliance with maritime safety regulations.

The shipment of goods must comply with the terms of the sales contract.

The shipment consisted of 500 units of electronics.

The shipment agreement specifies the delivery dates and liability for lost cargo.

Under the shipment contract, the risk passes to the buyer once the seller hands the goods to the shipper.

The shipment documentation must be verified before customs clearance.

The shipment regulation mandates proper documentation and packaging standards to prevent delays at the border.

The tenant held a shipp in the manor under the feudal system.

The shippe was delayed due to stormy weather.

The shipper is responsible for packaging the goods in compliance with the carrier's requirements.

The contract requires the buyer to pay all shipping charges upfront.

The shipping contract outlined the carrier's responsibilities and liability limits.

The shipping documentation must be complete to avoid delays in customs clearance.

The exporter provided all necessary shipping documents to ensure the cargo cleared customs without delay.

The company purchased shipping insurance to cover potential damages during transit.

Shipping law regulates contracts of carriage by sea and the rights of cargo owners.

The law regulates safety standards in a retail shop.

Consumers have the right to shop without unfair discrimination.

The shop steward negotiated with management over working conditions on behalf of the union members.

The suspect was caught trying to shoplift several items from the store.

She shopped around for the best insurance policy before signing.

The consumer filed a complaint regarding unfair charges during her shopping experience.

The parties executed a short form agreement to expedite the transaction.

The parties agreed to a short-term lease of six months.

The short-term liabilities must be settled within the fiscal year.

The employee filed a claim under his short-term disability insurance after surgery.

The company's short-term investments were recorded on the balance sheet as current assets.

The court reporter used shorthand to take down every word spoken in the trial.

The tenant should pay rent on the first day of each month.

If the defendant should fail to appear, the court may issue a warrant.

The lawyer will show the contract to support her argument.

The court scheduled a show to determine if the injunction should remain.

The judge issued a show cause order requiring the defendant to respond by next week.

The company was required to show cause why its license should not be revoked.

The dictator orchestrated a show trial to eliminate political opponents and sway public opinion.

The document shown to the court was accepted as valid evidence.

She has shown the contract to her attorney for review.

The shrinkwrap agreement became enforceable as soon as the user opened the software box.

The shrinkwrap license prohibited the user from redistributing the software.