The borrower was given a grace period of 30 days before penalties applied.

The judge granted the defendant grace in light of mitigating circumstances.

The borrower paid the overdue amount within the grace period to avoid penalties.

The contract includes a 10-day grace period before late fees apply.

The law firm hired several new grads this summer.

The gradation of penalties reflects the seriousness of each offense.

There is a clear gradation of property rights from leaseholder to freeholder.

The employee was promoted to a higher grade within the company.

The court graded the evidence as highly credible.

The property’s grade affects drainage requirements under local ordinances.

The company uses grade classification to establish salary ranges for its employees.

The student's performance was evaluated according to her grade level as defined by state education regulations.

The contract stipulated a minimum grade point average of 3.0 for scholarship renewal.

The court referred to the grade scale to assess the severity of the contract breach.

Under graded vesting, an employee earns ownership of retirement benefits in increasing percentages each year.

The employment contract referenced the grading scale to determine eligibility for promotion.

The grading system in law schools often influences eligibility for honors and distinctions.

The doctrine of gradualism supports piecemeal legislative reform over radical overhaul.

The graduate received their diploma after completing the legal studies program.

She will graduate from law school in May.

She earned a graduate degree in law to qualify for the bar exam.

The graduate student submitted a patent application based on her thesis research.

The law student attended the graduation ceremony after completing all requirements.

Graduation from the bar exam preparation course is required before taking the licensing exam.

The graduation ceremony officially conferred her law degree, allowing her to practice.

The city passed an ordinance imposing fines for graffiti on public property.

The defendant was charged with damage after creating a graffito on the public building's wall.

The official was arrested for accepting graft during the contract bidding process.

The surgeon performed a skin graft on the burn victim.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires financial institutions to protect customer information and provide privacy notices.

The court considered the grand theft charges particularly severe.

The grand returned an indictment against the defendant.

The grand jury decided there was enough evidence to indict the suspect.

The case was dismissed after the grand jury did not find probable cause.

The defendant received a grand jury subpoena to appear and provide documents relevant to the fraud case.

He was charged with grand larceny for stealing electronics worth over $10,000.

He was charged with grand theft for stealing expensive jewelry.

The courthouse has a grander façade after the renovation.

The court held the grandest view of constitutional rights in this landmark case.

The grandeur of the courtroom underscored the solemnity of the proceedings.

The zoning law included a grandfather clause allowing existing buildings to remain unchanged despite new height restrictions.

The grandfather clause was used in the South to prevent African Americans from voting despite the Fifteenth Amendment.

The property was transferred through a grant from the owner to the buyer.

The nonprofit received a grant to fund its educational programs.

The court granted the motion to dismiss the case.

Effective grant administration ensures that funds are used according to legal and contractual requirements.

The grant agreement outlined the obligations of the non-profit organization receiving the funds.

The research team signed the grant agreement before commencing the funded study.

The nonprofit submitted a grant application to fund its new community center.

The board's grant approval was required before the funds could be allocated.

The organization was audited for grant compliance to verify proper expenditure.

Effective grant compliance mechanisms help prevent misuse of public funds.

The buyer received a grant deed to ensure the property's title was free of undisclosed liens.

The nonprofit organization confirmed its grant eligibility before applying for federal funds.

The university secured grant funding to develop renewable energy technologies.

The nonprofit organization received grant funds to support its educational programs.

Effective grant management is essential to fulfill the conditions of the funding agreement and maintain eligibility for future grants.

The defendant received a grant of immunity in exchange for testimony.

The witness was offered a grant of immunity to testify against the accused.

The board executed a grant of power allowing the CEO to negotiate contracts.

The grant of power was recorded in the public registry to validate the agent's authority.

The grant statute authorized the transfer of state land to the university.

The grantee took possession of the land as specified in the deed.

The grantmaking foundation awarded funds to local nonprofits improving community health.

The grantor conveyed the deed to the grantee.

The state received grants-in-aid to improve its public transportation system.

The contract specified restrictions on modifying the graphic user interface of the software.

The court recognized the plaintiff's right to grasp the disputed property.

The judge struggled to grasp the complex details of the case.

The nonprofit engaged in grassroots advocacy to promote environmental protection laws.

The party was grateful for the prompt resolution of the dispute.

The gratification of the claimant's damages was ordered by the court.

The defendant expressed gratitude to the court for its leniency.

The court found the defendant's gratuitous promise unenforceable for lack of consideration.

The court held that the gratuitous promise was not binding due to lack of consideration.

The decedent's will included several gratuitous transfers to charity organizations.

The court ruled that the defendant's fee was characterized by gratuitousness and therefore unrecoverable.

The cemetery board established rules governing the size and materials allowed for grave markers.

The gravity of the defendant's actions led to a harsher penalty.

The gravity of the evidence persuaded the jury to convict.

The company took steps to prevent the gray market sales of its products.

Importing items via the gray market can lead to disputes concerning warranty coverage.

The company issued a warning about the risks associated with gray market goods, emphasizing warranty issues.

The court found that the defendant's actions posed a greater risk than previously assessed.

The greater conveyed the land to the grantee by warranty deed.

The company issued green bonds to fund renewable energy infrastructure.

She applied for a green card to live and work permanently in the United States.

He must carry his green card while traveling internationally as proof of residency.

A green card holder may apply for citizenship after fulfilling residency requirements.

The company purchased green certificates to prove their compliance with renewable energy regulations.

The government implemented policies to foster a green economy by investing in renewable energy.

The government introduced green energy incentives to encourage the use of solar panels.

The company secured green finance to fund its renewable energy infrastructure under new environmental regulations.

The government enacted new green law to reduce industrial pollution.

Environmental lawyers specialize in green law to advocate for sustainable practices.

The government enacted new green legislation to reduce carbon emissions.

The government introduced a green tax on carbon emissions to combat climate change.

The legislation targets the reduction of emissions of key greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane.

The company was fined for exceeding legal limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

Companies must follow the Greenhouse Gas Protocol to accurately report their emissions under environmental law.

The government enacted new greenhouse gas regulations to reduce carbon emissions from factories.

The company was accused of greenwashing after advertising its products as eco-friendly despite evidence of harmful emissions.

The soldier threw a grenade into the enemy bunker.

The company warned that purchasing electronics from the grey market could void the warranty.

The worker filed a grievance against the employer for wrongful dismissal.

The plaintiff's grievance alleged breach of fiduciary duty.

The union representative advised him on how to initiate the grievance procedure after the unfair dismissal.

The employment contract included a grievance procedure to handle any conflicts amicably.

The employee followed the grievance process to report harassment.

The labor union invoked the grievance process stipulated in the agreement.

The company established a grievance redress system to handle employee complaints effectively.

The company established a grievance redressal mechanism to handle employee disputes efficiently.

Effective grievance redressal systems are essential for maintaining organizational transparency.

The defendant was charged with grievous bodily harm after the assault.

The defendant was charged with grievous bodily harm after causing permanent injuries to the victim.

The defendant was found to have grievously harmed the plaintiff through reckless negligence.

The employee's gross salary exceeds the net income.

They bought a gross of pens for the office.

The statute bases tax liability thresholds on changes to the gross domestic product.

The taxpayer must report their gross income for the fiscal year on the tax return.

The contract specified that disputes over gross margin calculations would be resolved by arbitration.

The employee was terminated for gross misconduct after the theft was confirmed.

Gross misconduct includes acts such as violence, fraud, or harassment at work.

The court examined the impact of changes in the gross national product on regulatory compliance costs.

The court found the defendant liable due to gross negligence in maintaining the machinery.

The employee's gross pay was listed on the paycheck before deductions.

The company's gross profit increased significantly after reducing production costs.

The contract specifies that royalties will be calculated based on the company's gross revenue.

The gross total amount owed includes all charges before taxes and fees.

The contract specified the gross total due upon completion of services.

The lawyer cited a new ground for appeal in the case.

The contract transferred ownership of the ground to the buyer.

The aviation authority grounded all flights due to the storm.

The plaintiff filed the lawsuit groundlessly, without evidence to support the allegations.

The plaintiff failed to present sufficient grounds for dismissal of the lawsuit.

Groundwater law regulates how property owners may extract water from beneath the surface.

Disputes under groundwater law often involve aquifer depletion and contamination concerns.

The class action suit was filed on behalf of a group of consumers affected by the defective product.

The lobbying group advocated for changes in environmental regulations.

The court grouped the cases with similar legal issues together for a joint hearing.

The auditor reviewed the group accounts to verify the accuracy of the consolidated financial position.

The court ordered the child to be placed in a group home for his safety and wellbeing.

Under group liability, each partner may be held accountable for the firm's debts.

The court applied group liability to hold the entire corporation accountable for the manager's misconduct.

The court certified the case for group litigation to handle all similar claims together.

The judge issued a group litigation order to streamline the handling of the numerous similar claims.

The company applied for group relief to reduce its overall tax liability by offsetting losses from one subsidiary against profits from another.

Indigenous peoples assert group rights to protect their cultural heritage.

The defendant seemed to grovel before the judge in hopes of a lighter sentence.

The city enacted new growth management policies to control suburban sprawl.

Growth management statutes require municipalities to prepare comprehensive plans addressing land use and transportation.