The driver was cited for speeding in a motor vehicle.

The trust was used as a vehicle to transfer property to beneficiaries.

The city passed a new ordinance in alignment with the state's vehicle code.

He was cited for a vehicle code violation after running the red light.

The insurance company assessed the vehicle damage before approving the claim.

The company faced vehicle liability claims after the truck accident.

The vehicle owner is liable for any traffic violations committed using their car.

She completed the vehicle registration to legally drive her new car.

The police asked to see his vehicle registration during the traffic stop.

The vehicle regulation mandates regular emissions testing to reduce air pollution.

He was charged with vehicular assault after crashing his car into a pedestrian.

He was charged with vehicular homicide after the fatal car accident.

The plaintiff claimed vehicular liability for the injuries sustained in the car accident.

He was charged with vehicular manslaughter after the fatal car accident.

Vehicular manslaughter laws often impose harsher penalties if the driver was intoxicated.

The court pierced the corporate veil to hold the owner responsible for the company's debts.

The defendant attempted to veil his involvement in the transaction.

The judge was urged to consider the case behind a veil of ignorance to ensure fairness.

The court pierced the veil of incorporation to hold the owner personally liable.

The court used veil piercing to hold the owner personally responsible for the company's debts.

The venditor transferred ownership of the goods to the buyer upon sale.

The vendor delivered the goods as specified in the contract.

The vendor transferred the title to the buyer after the sale was completed.

The vendor agreement outlined delivery schedules and payment terms.

Vendor compliance is critical to maintaining the contractual relationship and avoiding penalties.

The company performed vendor due diligence to ensure all financial records were accurate before the sale.

Effective vendor management is crucial for mitigating legal risks associated with third-party contracts.

The court expressed veneration for the precedent established by prior rulings.

The villain sought vengeance against those who betrayed him.

Vengeance is discouraged by the legal system to maintain order and justice.

The plaintiff's vengeful motives were evident in the aggressive pursuit of damages.

The defendant acted vengefully after the contract was breached.

The defendant's vengfulness was cited as a possible motive for the retaliatory act.

The venire was called to the courtroom to begin jury selection.

The plaintiff claimed damages after the snake delivered venom causing permanent injury.

The two companies entered into a joint venture to develop new technology.

The lawyer ventured an opinion on the unsettled legal issue.

The startup secured venture capital to expand its operations.

Venture capital often comes from specialized firms or wealthy individuals seeking high returns.

The venture capital fund provided crucial financing to the tech startup during its initial expansion.

The venture capitalist funded the tech startup in its early stages.

The nonprofit adopted venture philanthropy to maximize social impact while maintaining legal compliance.

The court transferred the case to a different venue to ensure a fair trial.

The hearing will take place at the courthouse venue specified in the summons.

The contract's venue clause requires arbitration in New York City.

The attorney filed a motion for venue selection to transfer the case to a more convenient court.

The contract included a venue selection clause favoring arbitration in New York.

The defense filed a motion for venue transfer to a location with a more impartial jury pool.

The veracity of the witness's account was crucial to the case.

The court questioned the veracity of the submitted evidence.

The contract must include a verb specifying the obligations of each party.

The lawyer verb-ed the agreement clearly to avoid ambiguity.

The contract's obligations are described using verbs to specify duties.

The witness verbed his testimony clearly during the hearing.

The courier delivers the contract to the client promptly.

The court found sufficient evidence of verbal abuse in the domestic violence case.

Verbal abuse can contribute to a pattern of behavior justifying a restraining order.

The defendant was charged with verbal assault for threatening the victim in public.

The parties reached a deal based on verbal consent during the meeting.

The patient provided verbal consent before the medical procedure began.

The parties formed a verbal contract during the meeting, even though nothing was signed.

In legal writing, the verbal noun 'testimony' refers to the act of giving evidence.

The court reporter transcribed the testimony verbatim.

The contract contains the verbatim terms agreed upon by both parties.

The court reporter prepared a verbatim report of the trial testimony.

The lawyer's verbosity made the contract difficult to interpret.

The use of insider information in stock trading is considered verboten under securities law.

The jury delivered a guilty verdict after deliberating for three hours.

The verdictum declared the defendant guilty of all charges.

The contract included verifiable performance metrics to assess compliance.

Verifiable facts are essential to support a claim in court.

The verification of the affidavit was required before it could be accepted by the court.

The plaintiff submitted a verification to attest that the facts stated were true to the best of their knowledge.

The verifiers confirmed the authenticity of the contract.

The lawyer verified the authenticity of the contract before submission.

The witness verified the facts of the case during testimony.

The contract was written in the vernacular to ensure all parties understood its terms.

The court considered evidence presented in vernacular terms rather than legal jargon.

The latest version of the contract includes updated liability clauses.

The court reviewed both versions of the witness statement to determine discrepancies.

The company entered into a vertical agreement with its suppliers to control the distribution network.

The court examined the vertical agreement for potential violations of antitrust laws.

The court examined whether the vertical restraint violated antitrust laws by limiting competition among retailers.

The building's compliance with safety regulations required verification of its verticality.

The vessel was seized for violating international shipping regulations.

The blood was collected in a sterilized vessel for forensic analysis.

The vessel documentation must be current to comply with international shipping regulations.

The captain presented the vessel documentation during the port inspection.

The vessel operator must ensure that the ship complies with international safety regulations.

The shipowner completed vessel registration to comply with maritime regulations.

Maritime authorities enforce vessel safety regulations to prevent accidents at sea.

Employees are entitled to their vested benefits after completing five years of service.

The employee has a vested interest in the pension plan after five years of service.

The judge recused herself due to a vested interest in the case.

Once vested rights have been established, they are protected from arbitrary government interference.

The employee’s pension became a vested right after five years of service.

The employee's pension benefits will begin vesting after five years of service.

Vesting occurs gradually according to the terms of the trust agreement.

The vesting clause determined when the employee's stock options become exercisable.

Under the vesting clause in the trust, the beneficiary gains full ownership at age 25.

The employee received stock options that became exercisable upon the vesting event defined in the contract.

The employee must complete a five-year vesting period before owning the shares outright.

During the vesting period, the beneficiary cannot transfer or sell the stock options.

The employee's bonus follows a vesting schedule that grants full ownership after four years.

The judge donned her vestment before entering the courtroom.

The veteran received healthcare benefits under the Veterans Affairs program.

She is a veteran attorney known for her expertise in contract law.

Applicants claimed benefits based on their veteran status under federal law.

She studied veterans affairs law to better understand how to secure disability benefits for former servicemembers.

The veterans' benefits include healthcare, education aid, and disability compensation.

Veterinary law requires all practicing veterinarians to be licensed by the state.

The farmer filed a veterinary malpractice suit after his cow's condition worsened post-treatment.

The president exercised the veto to block the controversial bill.

The governor vetoed the legislature’s budget plan.

Congress achieved a veto override by securing two-thirds majority support.

The vetting of the contract ensured all terms were legally sound.

The committee is vetting the candidate’s background before approval.

The court dismissed the suit as vexatious due to its frivolous nature and intent to harass.

The court dismissed the case as vexatious litigation meant to intimidate the plaintiff.

The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's vexatiousness in filing repetitive motions.