Motte and Bailey Fallacy
/ˈmɒt ænd ˈbeɪli ˈfæləsi/
Definitions
- (n.) A rhetorical strategy that shifts between a defensible but modest claim (the motte) and a more controversial one (the bailey), used to evade criticism by retreating to the safer position when challenged.
The lawyer's argument was a motte and bailey fallacy, retreating to a legally uncontroversial point when pressed on a broader claim.
Forms
- motte and bailey fallacies
Related terms
See also
Commentary
Recognizing this fallacy is useful in legal advocacy to maintain consistency and avoid shifting grounds that can undermine credibility.
This glossary is for general informational and educational purposes only. Definitions are jurisdiction-agnostic but reflect terminology and concepts primarily drawn from English and American legal traditions. Nothing herein constitutes legal advice or creates a lawyer-client relationship. Users should consult qualified counsel for advice on specific matters or jurisdictions.