Circular Reasoning

/ˈsɜːrkjʊlər ˈriːzənɪŋ/

Definitions

  1. (n.) A logical fallacy in which the conclusion is assumed in one of the premises, creating a reasoning loop that lacks independent support.
    The court rejected the argument as it relied on circular reasoning, assuming the defendant's guilt to prove the defendant's guilt.

Commentary

In legal drafting and argumentation, avoiding circular reasoning is essential for sound and persuasive arguments; always ensure conclusions are supported by independent premises.

This glossary is for general informational and educational purposes only. Definitions are jurisdiction-agnostic but reflect terminology and concepts primarily drawn from English and American legal traditions. Nothing herein constitutes legal advice or creates a lawyer-client relationship. Users should consult qualified counsel for advice on specific matters or jurisdictions.

Draft confidently with Amicus

Create, negotiate, and sign agreements in one secure workspace—invite collaborators, track revisions, and keep audit-ready records automatically.

Open the Amicus app